Verified:

Jeremy Game profile

Member
179

Mar 10th 2012, 14:56:37

When my country makes a CM, I celebrate.

When my country makes a NM, I nod.

When my country makes a EM, I rage.

I think EMs need to be more powerful, and hurt a slightly larger amount of military. In my opinion, they kinda suck right now.

Tin Man

Member
1314

Mar 10th 2012, 15:06:51

EM's need to have a higher effect on lowering SDI. Or even make it so after a successfull EM you're guarenteed to land the next missile or something along those lines

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Mar 10th 2012, 17:21:22

i agree with both, atm cruises are mostly useless and are fired away quickly.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

sigma Game profile

Member
406

Mar 10th 2012, 17:42:34

Countries are pretty easy to kill as it is; I would not like to see it lowering the SDI significantly more than it already does.

I wouldn't be upset if EMs caused a greater % of readiness loss per successful hit; killing higher % of mil (maybe throw spies in there as well) would be interesting as well.

Forgotten

Member
1605

Mar 12th 2012, 1:11:37

i think missiles are fine...

~LaF's Retired Janitor~

jabberwocky Game profile

Member
330

Mar 13th 2012, 0:38:57

cruise missiles lower SDI? By how much?

Tertius Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1662

Mar 13th 2012, 1:56:59

I think EM dropping readiness by more than 2% would be nice.

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Mar 13th 2012, 7:28:40

agree. Some more military hurt or SDI would be nice.

trainboy Game profile

Member
760

Mar 20th 2012, 19:36:48

i sugguste as EMs they should skip sdi lthogether they would be quite awesome that way but maybe tone down readyness loss, now you em dump to cm rush