multi-tagged teams - Earth Empires Forum

Kyatoru

Member
688

Aug 18th 2010, 2:37:24

Maybe I'm beating a dead horse, but those teams with multiple tags should really form up in the alliance server. It's in dire need of more diversity. Let's help the game progress forward.

+Kya

Dragonlance

Member
1611

Aug 18th 2010, 2:41:38

1 team tag ftw.

we rox0r

archaic

Member
7014

Aug 18th 2010, 3:16:07

Everybody in most of those teams is already playing on alliance. A few of those teams are guaranteed instant detah if they ever show their tag on the other server anyway.

Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

H4xOr WaNgEr

Forum Moderator
1979

Aug 18th 2010, 3:30:29

RD for sure, but who else?

kwmi

Member
314

Aug 18th 2010, 3:31:41

indeed, LaF will just farm any small alliance and they cannot survive in the alliance server. Look whats happened to Ely.

MKR - HFA

de1i

Member
1640

Aug 18th 2010, 3:31:44

How many RDers are already playing in team though :P

Mr. Lime

Member
539

Aug 18th 2010, 3:44:18

lol how many RD in laf already?

ICQ: 20654127

Dragonlance

Member
1611

Aug 18th 2010, 4:02:15

don't most of Rd play in laf in alliance atm?

I'm not sure about that, but LaF will farm you to the ground if they think they can get away with it. Small groups and untaggeds have no hope in this server. Your only bet is to join an established alliance.

MKR - HFA

locket

Member
6176

Aug 18th 2010, 8:29:26

they simply have to band together and not have fluffty countries kwmi.

And not that I am sure about those not under official names but it is only ronnie and gains that are under their real names in laf. EEVIL had at least 2 with their names in their country names last set so I would assume more are there.

ViLSE

Member
862

Aug 18th 2010, 10:47:08

The two DBD teams are already all in Monsters over in the Alliance server.

diez

Member
1340

Aug 18th 2010, 11:04:07

I don't care as long as there are no cross-retals. It's not cool at all :/

snawdog

Member
2413

Aug 18th 2010, 11:07:29

Originally posted by diez:

I don't care as long as there are no cross-retals. It's not cool at all :/

HAHAHA rd HAHAHA rd HAHAHA rd..

ICQ 364553524
msn

OGT

Member
298

Aug 18th 2010, 16:33:45

small alliances can thrive but the players need to be good and they need to work together to make sure they are alinged probably.

gwagers

Member
1065

Aug 19th 2010, 18:52:07

I would like to point out that MKR, for one, discussed (briefly) moving to the alliance server when 1a became Team. It was considered an unattractive option because of Archaic's point. You wouldn't be gaining any more players, but would instead be killing another clan.

Peloponnese (PEHL-oh-puh-NEES): a mythical land of cheesecake

"We cannot enter into alliance with neighboring princes until we are acquainted with their designs..."--Sun Tzu

Who has time for that? BLAST THEM ALL!

Jelly

Member
277

Aug 19th 2010, 20:46:07

Well, that's MKR's fault for running bad countries and not being able to retal.

It doesn't take much to survive in 1A.

gwagers

Member
1065

Aug 19th 2010, 20:50:36

I'm not sure running bad countries (though I would dispute that in all cases besides my own) has anything to do with the point: ALMOST EVERYONE IN MKR ALREADY HAD A COUNCIL CLAN! My point, if you would care to understand it: Moving would kill us because we would have exactly two people left that didn't have prior commitments.

EDIT: And possibly less now because I've recently started playing Alliance too.

Edited By: gwagers on Aug 19th 2010, 20:53:24
See Original Post

Jelly

Member
277

Aug 19th 2010, 21:28:39

Well, if you guys want to stick together, then leave your Council alliances and form MKR, it would create some more diversity and it would be good for the game.

Viceroy

Member
893

Aug 20th 2010, 6:04:44

Think TIE, Death Knights, and Rogue agree that the server needed more diversity?

Death Before Doo Wop is its own unique tag.
We just happen to be a licensed subsidiary of Death Before Disco.

Edited By: Viceroy on Aug 20th 2010, 6:13:26. Reason: Clarity and Add-ity
See Original Post

And, Monsters, do not forget to specify, when time and place shall serve, that I am an ass.

ViLSE

Member
862

Aug 20th 2010, 8:58:32

Absolutely right Viceroy! :)

gwagers

Member
1065

Aug 20th 2010, 17:51:50

Why would a tag made up of people already playing in alliance create more diversity? In terms of actual countries, there would hardly be a difference.

Note: The above is a serious question, I'm not being sarcastic. You seem to think this is a viable strategy, I just want to know what I'm missing.

OGT

Member
298

Aug 20th 2010, 18:27:29

it would just create another small tag for larger tags to take advantage of, you want diversity then you need to attract more players, thats common knowledge.

Kyatoru

Member
688

Aug 21st 2010, 22:27:29

Alliances like Ely are failing because they sit around and mope instead of doing anything. More alliances create more politics and player interaction. Which is good for the game.

I'm starting an alliance there. We're bringing in outside players, retired players, etc.

+Kya

Kyatoru

Member
688

Aug 21st 2010, 22:31:06

Then there's the fact that the facebook application is coming and forming your structure now will be the best way to take advantage of the surge in players.

+Kya

braden

Member
11,480

Aug 22nd 2010, 14:05:40

I could be wrong, but I believe diversity is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era?

gwagers

Member
1065

Aug 22nd 2010, 20:48:32

I tried looking up "Diversity" on Wikipedia, and couldn't find anything. But I'd love to know more.